https://www.mediaite.com/entertainment/bill-burr-calls-out-morons-claiming-his-friend-bob-saget-died-from-vaccine/

Open SmartNews and read "Bill Burr Calls Out ‘Morons’ Claiming His Friend Bob Saget Died From Vaccine" here: https://share.smartnews.com/w8RKo
To read it on the web, tap here: https://share.smartnews.com/eCHLA

Psyral Infection said

No it is not appreciated. I like my "conspiracy bs" -  and half of the "conspiracies" I don't even believe but I still like them. It's a great polarizing denominator. With it, I can quickly determine which people (the ones who discount these "conspiracies") need to be removed from my life.  They are just no fun.   

Without a dedication to intellectual honesty and accuracy there is no care.

Sure, a number of things can seem unimportant, but there are a number of things that do matter more than people's feelings.

Healthcare is one of these things.

So you're eliminating people that care about you just so you can live either in an echo-chamber or an area that respects lying and dishonesty just as much as intellectual honesty and accuracy.

Sure, people can try to make the "noble lie" argument, but that's not even what you're forwarding here.

If the only thing you're focusing on is some perverse interpretation of "keeping the peace" by accepting everything that falls out of people's mouths are being equally valid, then you might want to take the time to see if you can find any exceptions to that belief system.

Healthcare is definitely one of those things.

krunk said
Think 2 different languages are being spoken here. Intellectual honesty to real scientists has nothing to do with rhetoric

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetoric

but with the math of observable results (dialectic).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic

Next time a cult pushes mandatory injections, perhaps genuinely question why. Or not.  

That's a dodge; we're talking about evidence based thinking.

Rhetoric and dialectics are both rooted in epistemology; that would be like saying maths and science are separate, or that language and science are separate. The links you posted even point to the relationship between rhetoric and dialectics.

Second, no cult is pushing injections. Medical scientists are trying to get people vaccinated.

In epistemology there are 5 sources of sophist novelty: self (ego), social (populism), dictation (authority), indoctrination (tradition) and dualistic defaulting (black & white, false dilemma, etc).

This is tied to how people interpret the world from top-down and down-up methods of induction and anchoring.

No one is appealing to those concepts. We're appealing to "argument from evidence" and "argument from demonstration".

When you default to "must be conspiracy" and rely on confirmation bias, all you're doing is weaving a tapestry of fallacies together, acting as if you can stack up enough lies to build a truth; that's not how that works. Nor can you stack up a number of falsehoods in hopes at least one may be correct (or at least lean in the way of a correct conclusion) and claim moral superiority. That would be Machiavellian, not pragmaticism nor consequentialism.

Unless you can provide statistics that support any of your claims then it would be wise for you to reconsider your position. If you claim there is nothing that can change your mind, then you're admitting to position of intentional intellectual dishonesty.

the_patriot_smack said
nobody gives a fuck about your opinion Milo

you are an idiot  

Why do you keep calling me Milo? You still haven't explained that.

You also have proven yourself to be an overly sensitive nuisance that only engages in conspiracies and personal attacks. Your adoption of conspiracy beliefs (from others) aren't even consistent from one week to another. From saying the vaccines alter DNA and kill people to saying they do nothing at all. From saying you're not afraid of needles to using childish language to describe vaccines like "jab".

Can you provide any statistical evidence to back up your beliefs, please? I'm asking nicely.

PrometheusComplex said

Why do you keep calling me Milo? You still haven't explained that.

because you come off as a fruity cocksucker 

the_patriot_smack said

PrometheusComplex said
Why do you keep calling me Milo? You still haven't explained that.

because you come off as a fruity cocksucker   

So you're homophobic as well as an unmedicated mental patient.

Nice to know.

Again, some of my posts on this forum are responses to [mostly your] misinformation. I also don't stan your twitter, you posted it, as other people have confirmed. Odd that you claim I "stan" your twitter, when you're claiming to stalk my account here. How else could you state that 60% of my posts are responses to you unless you clicked on my account and started looking at all of my posts.

As for you, all I did was click a link you posted to see if you were exactly the kind of mindless political tool you appeared to be; and you are. You instigate all of these discussions through explosive, childish rhetoric while trying to politicize science. You've dropped so many random politician's names on this thread it's shocking you aren't aware of your compulsion to jump on the far-right propaganda wagon. 

Your fixation/obsession with vaccinations and promoting misinformation is just odd, that's all. As long as you keep promoting misinformation, I'll probably respond. It's that simple. I also do not work for the Canadian Government, so I don't know why you think I'd care about any Non-Vax tax they have. This isn't "commies vs patriots" -political for me, it's about science and ethics.

Also, can you at least admit that it makes no sense for you to be obsessed with American politics when you're Canadian?

krunk said

  

And then later you post this shit.

Try consistency. Or at least take your prescriptions.

If I facepalmed any harder, I'd knock myself unconscious.

I can understand that some people don't understand magnets, but lacking the ability to comprehend even basic consistency?

Fucking hell.

Reminder that he blocked me because I hurt his sensitive little fee fees but he's too much of a hypocritical little bitch to take his lumps. He can dish it out but he can't take it.

Also, when he calls you a fruity cocksucker? Remember he saved pictures of me onto his computer. It's all just projection. He's afraid to admit he wants to gobble hog like life is a 24/7 pig roast.

krunk said

Hope 2 c u beyond the finish line of this shamdemic, @sleepy

I've decided to turn my genius up to 11 and kick it square in the balls, so maybe u should wear a helmet.  

It is hypochondria or a shamdemic? You really can't seem to make up your mind.