The Psychopathic Sex Offender should SUE ME! #BeastHost Vs. Will Sigler, #BeardRebuttal

they stand up for Michael Jackson.

wicket_juan said
they stand up for Michael Jackson.  

Michael Jackson is a legend and has nothing to do with this. The globalists and illuminati killed him and destroyed his reputation with slander and lies.

Guest said
Sigler was convicted, he pled guilty. Jackson was acquitted. Big difference. 

Theif, why you gotta drag liberals into this? Poppycock. I’m a sandal wearing, snowflake liberal with Sanders shirts in every color. I’m one beret away from a full blown socialist and I have been very vocal about this. I resurrected this thread from the archives on the day the video dropped. I am calling anyone that will listen on the phone and writting goddamn snail mail about Sigler. I plan on bringing full color pamphlets to GOTJ if I have the time. I’m a full-on nutbar. 

Liberals have nothing to do with this. Focus on the real enemy, Will Sigler and anyone gives him aide or support. Political ideology has nothing to do with Siglers rape.  

Funny he backs up MJ. I fucking adore Michael’s music and his performances. It’s the closest thing to magic that I’ve seen from a human being… well, him and the other MJ as well… Jordan can fly, yo… but, anyway…

Michael Jackson was not part of a conspiracy. There are legit court documents of him possessing copious amounts of child pornography. Whether he raped those kids, I don’t know for sure. But yes, he had those sick inclinations.

I replay the breakfast machine opening for my daughters on YouTube, the one from Pee Wee’s Big Adventure. Because it makes us laugh like loons, and that makes us happy. I know that he also, with actor Jeffery Jones from Beetlejuice, we’re convicted of having a goddamned TRUCKLOAD of child porn delivered to their homes. I didn’t even know there was a truckload of that shit.

Beetlejuice is still the film I’ve watched more than any other. I still enjoy Jeffrey Jones’ performance, despite his awful soul.

Phil Anselmo’s drunken racist ramblings (he publicly apologized for, by the way)… Lauryn Hill’s despicable racist quotes… I still enjoy their art. Their redeeming qualities, I guess… although not quite fully redeeming in the ultimate moral sense.

What am I getting at? Oh, yeah. You are blind, Fire Thief. Willingly.

And Guest, I’ll take a Bernie basketball jersey in green, please.

Ohh, okay…

It took me a while of slogging through that video to finally come to this REVELATION…

Beard Dude thinks he’s uncovered some massive repercussion that extends BEYOND this “all but irrelevant to anyone else situation” and is on a crusade for… What? I’m still trying to figure out just what the hell everyone wants to have happen with this…?

Either you believe Wil’s account (or you can at least conceive [pun?] of a scenario in which such events may have transpired) or you DON’T…

Anyone that does not believe Wil and believes what little information they have BEEN SHOWN as having been official record; WHAT DO YOU WANT?! “Explain themselves!” ABOUT WHAT?! They believe their friend and YOU DON’T! What MORE do you want? For them to put themselves out there while you sit knowing full-well that you ALREADY aren’t gonna listen to or believe anything they say about it… only to be accused of “Defending A Pedo”? Sounds enlightening.

I’ll give Beard Dude props for at least NOT ever calling him a pedophile as Wil never fucked babies or wants to fuck babies which is what a, ‘er excuse me “PEDO” actually is. (but then again the next video has the word in the title)

A couple observations: that website he gets all that “info” and “non-biased” information from, looks JANKY AF! Let me refresh my Netscape Navigator settings to view that one!

Everyone knows that in some places “Public Urination” and “Mooning” can get you on a “Sex Offender” list, right?

On one hand, Beard Dude admits that there are many aspects of “the crime” that are in dispute but then USES said “unknown aspects” as FACT later on when reading and denouncing Wil’s explanations as to his defense (ie that the events did not transpire the way he was charged with)??

He assumes that a “plea deal” was directed at a reduction of charges rather than for a reduced sentencing.

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t doubt certain “facts” of “the crime” that would affect the final outcome and then believe every other thing you think you know about it…

Believe him or don’t. But at least sling yer arrows in a straight line.

I’m actually more interested to learn other people’s reasons for NOT believing Wil about this (not having some encyclopedic Psychopathic Records memory bank to work conspiracies out of myself). Why not? Did I miss something about HIS felony that I somehow managed to accept about YOURS?

Don’t get me wrong… the guy fucked up SOMEwhere along the line fer shure! Psychopathic said certain shit and then that 6Foot video came out to contradict that shit that was said in the minds of those people that think it’s important for them to know more.

But I really think that once this “Pedophile” thing gets put into perspective with the masses that are acting on the WORD being used and not the FACTS behind it… the conversation DOES begin to change a bit, donut?

I’m not sure WHAT I believe about it all; as well as, why we’re all supposed care so much more about it than we do.

Ay, ay, AY!

You evuh watch one’A them Traci’s Lords’s pornos? The one’s where she’s got all them dicks up in ‘er, lovin’ it like a bad good should?

GOTHCHA!

You’re a PEDOPHILE!

That bitch was FIFTEEN when she traveled the world suckin’ dick LONG before she was suckin’ as a “legitimate actress” in straight-to-video sci-fi movies (predicated upon the knowledge that she is an “Ex” pornstar) and peaking as a vampire in “Blade”!

https://youtu.be/NfNPFekGJQ0?t=4m33s

oh wait… then there’s this thing you can still buy (as product placed in the Denzel Washington movie, “Virtuosity”):

So now that we’re all PEDOs… let’s continue this discussion… shall we? SHALL WE?!

Huh?!

Huh?!

https://youtu.be/_Uu9d4ip25c

Guest said
…Focus on the real enemy,..

U mean Nazi dolphins like

Actually, I think I am wrong about CPN. He may be correct after all. It seems that the Ohio appeal court has reversed the decision of the Sigler case in the lower Court of Common Pleas. Hence, having to register under this new bill is NOT unconstitutional. In fact, one of the decisions I am about to bring shows that because of the SEVERITY of the offense, it was not an issue to make him register under Adam’s Law. That is CPN’s point. I think Chuck Reeves fucked up by not reading these cases. CPN apparently has. Good for him.

Let’s look at Wallis v. State 2009-Ohio-3874.
https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/5/2009/2009-ohio-3874.pdf

Respondent-appellant the State of Ohio appeals a judgment of the Court of

Common Pleas of Richland County, Ohio, which found Senate Bill 10, Ohio’s Sexual

Offender classification and registration scheme, to be unconstitutional in its entirety.

[…]

Appellee was convicted of sexual battery in Richland County Court of

Common Pleas in 2005. The record does not disclose whether appellee’s conviction was the result of a plea agreement.
[…]

Appellee received a notice of new classification and registration duties under R.C. 2950.01 et seq., as amended by Senate Bill 10, also known as the “Adam Walsh Act”. The statute as amended was effective July 1, 2007, after appellee’s conviction and sentencing. Appellee contested the reclassification, asserting the new legislation violates several provisions of the Ohio and United States Constitutions, and imposes new obligations and additional substantial burdens on him. He also alleged the change in registry requirements directly violates his original plea agreement.
[…]
In each assignment of error, appellant argues the trial court erred in finding Senate Bill 10 to be unconstitutional on multiple grounds. We agree.
[…]
The court cited its decision in Sigler, supra, wherein it found Senate Bill 10 unconstitutional. However, this court has since reversed the court’s decision. Sigler v. State, Richland App. No. 08-CA-79, 2009-Ohio-2010. In Sigler, we found, as courts across Ohio have repeatedly held, Senate Bill 10 is constitutional and does not violate prohibitions against retroactive or ex post facto laws. Id. at paragraph 89.
The appellant’s assignment of error IV may be inapplicable here as to any plea bargain, but we find the prior classification system did not create the expectation that appellee will never be the subject of further legislative action.
In accord with our previous holding in Sigler,each of appellant’s assignments of error is sustained.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, Richland County, Ohio, is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court for further proceedings in accord with law and consistent with this opinion.

 

So it seems that the Ohio Court of Appeals, where these perverts sued over the federal registry in fact OVERTURNED the original decition was made in the Sigler case in the Court of Common Pleas .