King Lucem Ferre said
In hip hop you usually don’t get sued unless you’re selling it though. Usually. Never have heard of a case where a rapper was sued over a free song.

i got put through the wringer, twice. 

did it end up in court?  no… because im not fuckin stupid.  i looked it up, saw that they were in the right, and bent over.  pulled the tracks. 

somewhere in the files of [jerkoff record label] is a piece of paper with my signature on it, swearing never to release that song or album again, nor to ever sample anything owned by [jerkoff record label] again. 

and, as youve probably surmised, they gagged me. 

its a little looser these days, i expect, but that dont mean the laws have been changed.  they havent. 

LuckyNumbrXIII said
Meh… you don’t get to where ICP is without being a risk taker. 

also, they can afford to pay the penalties, when/if caught.  i cant. 

And I mean… those chunk mixes…. can he get sued for punitive damages?

‘can’?  absolutely. 

‘will’?  doubt it. 

gee, lucky, if you got a problem with me, spell it the fuck out.  dont dance around it. 

absent that, id say you should just give it up.  youll never get the hook out by pulling on the barb. 

i didnt say fuck you, or that youre a prick, or any other bullshit like that, cuz i dont feel that way. 

how do you feel…?  cuz from what im seein… 

Miklo Velka said
Looks like that shitty Hallowicked track has put Scruffy in a cranky mood……..

yeah, right. 

go on with your thing thing, if its all you got. 

im fine.  and i aint tryin to have you get me worked up, much as youd enjoy it. 

you have yourself a nice night. 

LuckyNumbrXIII said
I thought I was pretty clear?
I wanted to discuss something with someone with experience, and they keep telling me to google it.  

utter misquote.  i said nothing of the sort.  go back and read it again. 

And simultaneously, said person [you, scruffy, the defendant], is accusing me of not changing my stance, but rather arguing it further.

no, i am not.  see above. 

Meanwhile I’m just asking about specifics to see if there’s anything different about our case here, from the scenario you’re discussing.  

and i attempted to answer the parts that were questions.  honestly, not all that much of it reads as ‘asking about specifics’.  see above. 

Then when you continuously accused me of “not hearing” you,

once, nothin continuous about it.  see above. 

and arguing, I said you’re becoming an uptight prick.  

regarding this part:  sure.  that is what happened.  no need to read that again. 

Then I posted that last thing… which I also think is self explanatory.  Anything else? 

all right then.  taken at face value. 

bayAreaShaman said 
As the primitive chicken grew up it saw in its life time small mutation to its genes. Just enough to complete to complete the evolution to a full chicken. Then it laid eggs. 

my contention on this one has always been that whatever it was before it was a chicken, it was still laying eggs. 

thus, eggs first, then chickens. 

hell, the dinosaurs were layin eggs. 

if it was ‘the chicken or the chicken egg’, that would be a lil different.