Andrew Breitbart and his friend Larry Solov (a Jew who is now Breitbart CEO) conceived of the idea of founding Breitbart News Network, with “the aim of starting a site that would be unapologetically pro-freedom and pro-Israel.” In fact, it was under Bannon’s tutelage that Breitbart expanded into Jerusalem.

The anti-Semite statements come from his wife during a heated custody battle saying he did not want his children at Archer Academy because of the Jewish population there. He claimed he had no problem with it and that is why he enrolled them into the Archer Academy. Other claims she had were of domestic abuse yet the case never went to trial because she would not show up in court.

Under Brannon, he hired more Jewish workers than any other person at Breitbart.

Other claims of him being racist come from his take on identity politics, “diversity” and multiculturalism which is, as he claims, nothing more than the racist spawn of slavery and segregation. Anything that specifically forces you to divide a population based on race is racist whether it is called diversity or multiculturalism. This un-apologetic take on multiculturalism, of course, means he is racist since it is against one of the left's core ideas instead of anti-racist since he wants no division of the population by race... That's so racist :P

Now, everyone is free to believe the main stream media (that lied during the entire presidential campaign - proof is in the DNC and Podesta emails where they specifically paid the media to oversample polls and only post stories that showed Clinton winning). No wonder everyone on the left was surprised when Clinton lost since the media had been paid to lie in a failed attempt to suppress Trump support votes. These are clearly shown in multiple emails which the MSM was told specifically not to report or cover. This is not conspiracy, it is all out there and easy to find but not in the media that the receipts show (and have not been denounced by the Clinton campaign - since they can't... it is their bank ledgers) were paid to specifically not report. And the proof they were told is all out there too. (If anyone cares to see the emails, let me know, there are a lot)

I personally believe that to still believe the same media that was paid to lie throughout the campaigns and think they are telling you the truth about anything in the post-election period is silly.

This is what the mainstream media wants you to believe a "white nationalist" looks like. pic.twitter.com/nlY9JF7JL1

— Lee Stranahan (@stranahan) November 14, 2016

What did Andrew Britbart, Larry Solov and Alex Marlow, three jews had in common again? Oh yeah, they were all FRIENDS of Bannon

— The_Positivist (@SuperPositivist) November 14, 2016

And about reports of all the violence by Trump supporters?
https://twitter.com/JaredWyand/status/797817010298253312
https://twitter.com/JaredWyand/status/798246194745057280
If you believe the main stream media, there are countless reports of violence by Trump supporters but surprisingly when you contact law enforcement in those areas, you find that no one has reported anything. So far, many of the claims are coming back as being faked including the racist graffiti being shown on the news.

When you have people who work with the DNC saying on hidden camera that legal or ethical does not matter, they just have to fight against Trump at all costs, and again with emails (Yep those Russian ones that have been proven to be really from one of the DNC staffers and not from Russia) stating that they were going to create allegations of racism and sexual misconduct to discredit Trump and specifically writing the stories to be put into the Wall Street Journal and other media outlets, it makes me wonder how many other lies the Democrats and the Media have been making up. And the left takes it as gospel truth.

So to those who think the Podesta and DNC and Clinton emails are altered, I wrote about this before and was completely ignored:

Now while many think that the emails were the Russians, they were not. Even though the media would not cover it, the DNC "hack" was not so much of a hack as a whistle blower within her own party. The Podesta emails were the result of his own stupidity. His emails showed he fell for phishing scams on more than one occasion and his password was "p@ssw0rd" (which is listed in the top 25 most used and hacked passwords to use). He actually emailed himself his own password for some reason. And the claims that the emails had been altered have been completely debunked by the DKIM cryptographic signatures in the emails. Clinton's servers used this identification system as does Gmail and many other email servers. Yes there has been some people who made fake ones saying they were leaked but a quick search using the emailID and DKIM verification quickly shows the faked ones. And not one DKIM signed email has ever been denied by the Clinton campaign.

--------

And so I don't end up burying @slumerican502 's good post (Actually a few he wrote) ...

One of the reasons I woke up to what the fuck was going on in the media. They were trashing him at every turn and I bought it like you guys did. Until I looked into it more.

For real, yall check out the Common Sense episode. It might not make you feel better but I guarantee a better understanding of what's going on and why Trump was elected in the first place.

@lucem-ferre , I don't personally call them morons. They were lied to and the media would not report the truth. I am not sure it is their fault at all. They fell into a cleverly devised plan.

As for the emails, here are a few. I will have to search again for more since it's been a while since I was processing the email database. I will get more to you later.

Intentional Oversampling:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26551#efmANvAPX
And the attachment to the above email:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//fileid/26551/7326

This one from Langer Research (Page 5 - Methodology: Read about partisan divisions)
http://www.langerresearch.com/.....ingNo1.pdf

Reuters IPSOS sampling and these are just 4 of them. Every single one oversamples Democrats and/or Women.
https://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=7333
https://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=7353
https://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=7351
https://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=7344

Some news articles about it (This is media so understand that media can be corrupt - read with discretion)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....icans.html
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/.....inton-lead
http://heatst.com/politics/pre.....y-clinton/

And about media collusion "off-the-record":
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12063#efmAk6AnI
And this one has links to many of the emails showing mainstream media is scripted and controlled by the Hillary campaign.
http://thefreethoughtproject.c.....ils-media/

It is no wonder the Democrats thought that Hillary was going to win when they were lied to by the Clinton campaign the entire cycle in an attempt to discourage Trump voter turnout. It backfired. Those on the left were completely shocked. Those on the right that have been following the "oversampling" and re-adjusting to correct the bias, were not shocked at all. The poll numbers from a month prior up to election day(corrected for bias) showed Trump was going to win. Not something the Clinton campaign would ever let the media publish. They had to make it known that she was going to win overwhelmingly to keep Trump voters at home.

Also if you want more stuff, you should check out some of the emails where they planned specifically to create stories of Trump sexual misdeeds to go along with the "grab her by the pussy" tape. Once that tape (which is real) was released, it would make the other stories sound more probable. As has been said, they had to do everything, no matter the "legal or ethics" behind it, to prevent Trump from winning. The ends would justify the means.

And about the people who tell you that she won the popular vote, she did. But the candidates agreed to an electoral race, not a popular race. If they had been running on popular vote, they would have campaigned completely differently. http://www.businessinsider.com.....ies-2013-9

If I remember correctly, there are some code words referring to pedophilia and child sex rings in some of the emails. Of course that's assuming people on 4chan actually know what they're talking about as far as "code words" are concerned.