The legal definition of treason in the US specifies "enemies" not "foreign power". What law are you referencing with "foreign power"? Please cite your source, I believe you are misinformed. Get up to speed, man. 

The "enemies" wording of the law has enough wiggle room to avoid treason with the information we have now. That's a fact. It may change, but right now it is a cold fact. Lawyered. 

You use the word treasonous. As all crimes do, treason has a specific definition. It is legally defined Under Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution as: Levying war against the US or adhering to its enemies by giving them Aid and Comfort. Colluding with a foreign power does not fall under that unless they are enemies. Pretty simple stuff.

When you are talking about a crime, you have to cite an actual law. You just can't make shit up. That's how the legal system works. Educate yourself. 

There were multiple links, one which looked at the kid who was killed for cospkaying, one which showed gray faced pictures which had several people who were racially ambiguous, and one that talked about the rise in police homicides. There was another one that I couldn't link because it wss too hard to navigate on my phone which gave the specific numbers which I repeated. Another which listed the safest states, of which ut was not one, for black people. 

And even if it wss just the 1, 1 out of 30,000 is way more than the ten or so out of 3 million. 

You're white. You don't know how black people feel. There are reasons there are fewer black people in your entire state than there are people at my college.

Noah Fence said
There were multiple links, one which looked at the kid who was killed for cospkaying, one which showed gray faced pictures which had several people who were racially ambiguous, and one that talked about the rise in police homicides. There was another one that I couldn't link because it wss too hard to navigate on my phone which gave the specific numbers which I repeated. Another which listed the safest states, of which ut was not one, for black people. 

And even if it wss just the 1, 1 out of 30,000 is way more than the ten or so out of 3 million. 

You're white. You don't know how black people feel. There are reasons there are fewer black people in your entire state than there are people at my college.  

But it doesn't show a trend. And that's my whole point.  You desperately tried to prove a point, couldn't find ANY statistics that back it up, then you default to "not enough black people" though I live here and I know that there are enough black people here to show a trend if they were targeted to be shot by cops over nothing. And then you want to pretend a list of safest states, mind you safety in general, no specific topic on the safety, not including Utah at the top means that black people get killed by cops. That is fear mongering bullshit.

I never said I know how black people feel. You are the one who keeps trying to speak for them. I said that racial tension here in Utah is not the same as every where else. As much as I can't speak for black people, I also can't speak for other white people because we are all individual minds who think for ourselves. But I can speak on my experience and conversations with both. Nothing that I have seen happen points towards racial tension anywhere near the level of some where like Ferguson. So, again, you talk out of your ass to spread fear mongering propaganda. And yes it is fear mongering when you fight so hard to push a LIE.

scruffy said
whats wrong with sayin 'holmes'?  

i call people that, holmes.    

I dunno... maybe it's a regional thing... like calling 'soda' "pop" 'er sum shit...

I just always figured it was something like, "homes" as in "homie" and not "holmes" as in some Sir Arthur Conan Doyle type shit...

Comin' up in Florida, I've never thought the Chicanos were calling me the Sherlock to their Watson...

But hey... I guess I ain't "from the streets" enough to be getting a li-bary card and readin' all them books with words n'shit.

I did like that Sega CD game about it though!

'~'=

To be "lawyered" only requires a Marshall. 

For Trump to be convicted of treason in the real world, you know, the one we live in... A real law will have to be cited. A real judge would theoretically be present. They would not have his trial on an internet forum using the whims of Noah Fence as precedent. I was talking about a real world situation. Collusion and treason are different crimes, that is a cold fact.  Marshalled? 

I stand by my original statement. At this point, we are a long way from Trump committing treason. If there is evidence of it, it has yet to surface publicly. When Mueller is finished, perhaps we will know more. Noah was rebutting my statement to that effect. No facts have been presented here that contradict what I have said. Juggalos, Juggalettes, FBI, Trump, whatever... We all live in a world of facts. Mine check out. 

You think you're so tough just because you have a picture of Ice T as your profile picture, don't you?

damn...this dude just punked Faygo Luvers! FUK OFF!