Log In
Sign Up
Home
9:37 pm
September 18, 2012
Offline
Iris The Tranny juggalette said
krunkazphuk said
Sperg. Thread. Needs. Soundtrack.YouTube Video Feminists Love Islamists
Ayyyyyyyyyy, I remember that video.
Anyways, don't have anything resembling the time to read all that,
I've heard plenty of horror stories of Islamic refugees committed shit, saw some of the court cases even, but in terms of statistics I don't know how significant the number of instances is,
but I just wanted to throw in my obligatory FUCK ISLAM
Nothing infuriates me more than the fact that I am allowed to say ANYTHING I want about Christianity, literally anything and the only people that will give a single shit, are Christians themselves.
But if I dare to speak out against a religion equally as bad, suddenly I'm somehow racist.
Sure, that makes sense.
I would be KILLED ON FUCKING SIGHT if I went anywhere near a country practicing Sharia Law
And yes, Sharia Law in those countries is being followed TO A TEE
It's almost impressive how well they follow that fucking book.
Here's a random story I typed and realized was too long
A while ago, during pride month (don't remember what year) a gay cartoonist in an islamic country who posted through a VPN, made a post lamenting how his friends in the US and UK were celebrating pride while he had to stay hidden in constant fear of getting, you know, killed.
And what happened, some people were ACTUALLY attacking him, fucking feminists, our supposed biggest supporters, were antagonizing someone who was depressed that he was under CONSTANT FUCKING PERSECUTION
And what happened, some piece of filth that deserves to be skinned alive and bathed in salt, managed to find his location through the fucking VPN and expose him to his government, we got to see his last post as he attempted suicide immediately afterwards knowing they were coming for him. He survived and was hospitalized and was to be tried for his crime of, you know, being gay.
If I remember correctly the precedent for his area was a punishment of whipping and jail time, which, as many were quick to point out would most likely kill someone who was just recovering from a suicide attempt.
And truth be told I didn't hear the end of that story, and, given that nobody ever told me, I think it was buried/obscure.
Anyways, to recap, a gay man made a post about how everybody literally wanted to kill him, he got caught, and so now they are going to kill him. And the response from the far left was condemning him.
I can't comprehend how the same people that want people to be fired for not using fucking neo-pronouns, something even the LGBT community is divided on, just turns the other fucking cheek when people are FUCKING KILLING US
And I don't even wanna hear the claim that they are just talking about first world moderate muslims,
I'm sure that's the intention for most people, and like, sure it makes sense, it's still stupid that I'm not allowed to criticize them but I am allowed to criticize Christianity, but whatever.
That part doesn't matter because that's not what happens.
Because they are so afraid of hurting those people's feelings, that they refuse to admit that they are CHERRYPICKERS.
The Koran, what's written in the Koran is one of the most disgusting things I've seen in my entire life.
Those great, positive muslims, those gay muslims, those feminist muslims, they are what we call Cherry Pickers, people who claim they follow a religion but only select the few good passages that suit them.
It's how the church that hosts an LGBT youth club 10 mintues from me and the Westboro baptist church both claim to follow the same book, they cherrypick what they want, and use Apologetics to explain away what they don't want.
But because they refuse to admit that this is the case with Islam, which it indisputably is, they have decided to pretend that mother fucking Islam is a religion of peace.
No, nooooooo it's fucking not, it is VIOLENT as hell, you are supposed to kill infidels, you are supposed to tax people of other religions, etc. but whatever, who cares if it's peaceful, claim it's peaceful all you want, you're stupid, but who cares.
But they also like to pretend that it's not only egalitarian, it's straight up "feminist", using feminsist in the most positive way in that statement.
I LITERALLY can't think of a more outrageous claim if I tried, I actually can't.
Fire is cold is a less outrageous claim than that the Koran being progressive.
I'd go on a cited rant showing all of the worst passages in it, but I don't even wanna fucking bother, I've done that 3 times already on this forum, I just needed to vent all that and go back to whatever the fuck I was doing.
I'll criticize whoever the fuck I want, and when I see a book that wants me FUCKING DEAD, I'm not going to pretend that it doesn't in order to not hurt some cherry picking hypocrite's feelings.
Shit talk Islam all you want. Islam is trash. The bible is trash. Christianity is trash. Judaism is trash. What's happening in the middle east is trash. Just don't be a bigot and pretend that this means everybody that believes in all of those trash religions are the same kind of trash is all I ask. Or fear mongering to keep people trying to escape the trash of Islam from doing so.
the_great_white_smack said
The most aggravating leftists are not openly radical ideologues like Jeremy Corbyn or Bernie Sanders, but those who, like “Science Guy” Bill Nye, dress up their zealotry in the guise of detached, politically neutral expertise.
In that sense, the “fact-checking” website Snopes, currently begging for donations to stay afloat, is the Bill Nye of the web. In the 1990s, when the website was founded, it could reasonably claim to be an apolitical debunker of popular myths. Today, however, it barely bothers to conceal its left-wing slant.
Snopes allows openly left-wing writers, including former BuzzFeed writer Alex H. Kasprak and Bethania Palma, a Raw Story and Truthout contributor who linked Donald Trump to the KKK and defended a professor’s anti-white comments, to fact-check stories about the right.
Here is a small selection of Palma’s published Raw Story articles, collected by Breitbart’s Charlie Nash:
Some of Palma’s articles include: “Donald Trump has some enthusiastic new admirers: White supremacists“, “The science of white privilege…“, “These conservatives are freaking out about Trump calling for Russian ‘cyber warfare’ against the US“, “WATCH: Donald Trump just gave his most f*cking bonkers press conference yet“, “Anti-debt crusader Rand Paul owes businesses more than $300,000 after failed 2016 campaign“, “Donald Trump Jr. claims Obama ‘plagiarized’ his RNC speech — and is promptly slapped down“, “Right-wing radio host questions the loyalty of Muslim dad whose son died serving US Army in Iraq“, “Republican National Convention staffers scrambling to remove Jim Crow-like ‘white elevators’ signs“, “WATCH: MSNBC interview gets heated when Tamron Hall confronts Trump-loving actor over sexist tweets“, “WATCH: CNN interview on Black Lives Matter spins out of control as conservative sheriff berates host“, and “White woman walks through Chicago’s South Side wearing ‘Black America, I’m sorry’ sign.”
Snopes has allowed the author of these articles to run stories on their own site about the Trump administration and the Republican party:
Snopes has allowed Palma to write most of her fact checks about Donald Trump, his Cabinet, and the Republican Party, despite her strong partisan opinions on those subjects.
Palma has also written two hit-pieces for Snopes on Donald Trump’s White House Chief Strategist and former Breitbart News Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon, writing two articles: “Steve Bannon Accused of Domestic Violence” and “Steve Bannon Accused of Having White Supremacist Views” on the same day.
Palma has also fact-checked stories about the alleged ties of the Trump campaign to the Russian government. She rated one such story, about Paul Manafort’s ties to Russia, as a “mixture” of true and false.
If Snopes were allowing left-wingers to fact-check stories about alleged right-wing wrongdoing on the grounds that their political biases would make them keener to reveal the full, grim truth about their reporting subjects, then the website would have a defence. But for this defence to hold, Snopes would have to employ right-wingers to fact-check allegations of left-wing wrongdoing. Does Snopes do this?
Of course not. Stories about Hillary Clinton siding with the Kremlin during her time as Secretary of State, accidentally funding ISIS, and breaking down after the election were all fact-checked by none other than … Bethania Palma. Snopes is allowing partisan left-wingers to fact-check claims about their own side as well as claims about their opponents. Sort of like allowing one hockey team to have goalkeepers on both sides of the rink!
Of course, it’s possible that Snopes simply doesn’t have enough right-wingers on its staff to fact-check claims about Clinton and other Democrats. But that would be a problem in itself, wouldn’t it? How can Snopes possibly remain impartial if it does not audit the political biases of its staffers? And if it does, why haven’t the results of such an audit be made public?
Other organizations that maintain a public front of neutrality, like NPR, the BBC, and CBC could no doubt be asked the same question.
The left, determined to maintain their dominance of culture, want to be the arbiters of truth. From ever-expanding “hate speech” laws in Europe to their efforts to quash dissent on college campuses, their war to control the flow of information can be seen everywhere. They want nothing less than the ability to determine what kind of information is legal, what kind of information is “hateful,” and what kind of information is true.
Look around, and their weapons are obvious: supposedly impartial news organizations like the BBC, supposedly impartial “scientists” like Bill Nye, and supposedly impartial fact-checkers like Snopes.
That’s why the left-wing media is in a frenzy to assist Snopes’ efforts to stave off financial ruin. Culture warriors need their weapons.
So you got a fear mongering opinion peace making claims that it can't actually back up and you think that's proof?
Dude, you're sad. All it amounts to is "I don't like the things they say so they are wrong!"
Ladies and gentle men, confirmation bias the thread.
9:45 pm
May 4, 2014
Offline
I ♥️ u, Iris.
YouTube Video Christmas in Afganistan ~ Rucka Rucka Ali
 |
 |
 |
9:45 pm
March 30, 2018
Offline
lol snopes
snopes
2019 will go down as the year lucem admits he's a moron and probably a rapist too
nobody has fought harder to defend rapists than you have and snopes in your answer for it
fucking incel
THE ALMIGHTY SMACK
9:47 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
Offline
Vinyl do you have any sources that AREN'T non-credible blogs, far right think tanks, far right news sites, or conspiracy sites?
As I was skimming I saw:
Gateston Institute (a far right think tank known for its anti-islam articles)
Breitbart (a far right news site that has posted factually inaccurate information)
And fucking info wars (a conspiracy theory website)
How can you expect anyone to take these claims seriously?
Pick a few articles from non-biased sources a and post those. Don't force us to wade through a river of bullshit.
Here's one:
New crime study: Rise in Sweden's rape stats can't be tied to refugee influx
The number of reported rapes and other sexual offences has been on the rise in Sweden since 2005 and has seen two distinct spikes: one between 2005 and 2008 and another after 2015.
There is little disagreement on these basic facts. Determining the reason behind these numbers is another matter, however.Some say it is due to the way in which sexual crimes are reported in Sweden, where all reported events are recorded as crimes and several offences of the same type are recorded separately. In other words, if someone reports being raped by the same perpetrator five times, in Sweden that would be recorded as five potential crimes rather than one.Others use the spike in rape statistics after 2015 to argue that the increases are due to the large influx of refugees into Sweden. This is an argument that can be found all over certain sectors of online media, where Sweden is positioned as the 'rape capital' of the world and the finger is pointed, either implicitly or explicitly, squarely at the new arrivals from predominantly Muslim cultures.In an attempt to determine what truly lies behind the rape and sexual assault statistics, the Swedish government last year ordered the country's National Council on Crime Prevention (Brå) to look into why the number of reported rapes in the country has increased. Brå was tasked with finding out whether the increase related to specific types of sexual offences, certain situations, or certain groups of perpetrators.The results of that study were released on Wednesday but they may do little to quell the debate. Brå analyzed statistics from official police reports and its own National Safety Survey (NTU) results between 2005 and 2017, focusing on both rapes and 'sexual molestation' (sexuellt ofredande), a rather broad category that can include anything from inappropriate touching to sending sexually explicit messages.Both crimes increased dramatically over that time span, with sexual molestation incidents involving victims aged 15 or older more than doubling from 3,400 to 7,400 and rapes nearly doubling from 3,000 to 5,300. A previous report from Brå showed that rapes overall increased by ten percent in 2017 alone.While the percentage of those reporting violent rapes showed more or less no change, the number of people who reported in the NTU that they had been subjected to other types of sexual assaults more than doubled, from less than one percent of respondents to just under 2.5 percent.Brå concludes that the initial spike in figures seen after 2005 "is largely explained by the legal definition of rape expanding" in that same year.The second major increase in rape and other sexual crime statistics occurs after 2015, which fuels the argument that it is connected to the increase of asylum seekers in Sweden. But Brå concludes that this is not the case.The board openly acknowledges that because NTU results do not include any information on ethnicity, it can only offer "tentative analyzes that cannot give easy answers" but it says the numbers don't add up.The roughly 163,000 people who came to Sweden in 2015 corresponds to 1.6 percent of the national population. Brå writes that "it is not unreasonable to think that the over-risk of crime would be higher for the asylum seekers who came in 2015, because many of them were men, and many were unaccompanied boys".The council writes that even if it assumes that these male asylum seekers are five times more likely to commit crimes than those already in the country, their arrival could only account for an eight percent increase in sex crimes.To place the blame for the entirety of the increases seen in the rape statistics between 2015 and 2016, one would have to assume that asylum seekers are 83 times more likely to commit crimes than others."Such a high over-risk does not seem likely," the report concludes.The report also found that the rise in reported rapes between 2011 and 2017 was linked to incidents that did not involve the use of violence, committed by perpetrators known to the victim – which also make up the majority of sexual crimes. There was no rise in outdoor attacks by strangers in the same time period.While this reveals very little about the identity or ethnicity of the attackers, it contradicts the theory floated by hard-right media that there are immigrant men wantonly attacking Swedish women.The report could also not find a link between those municipalities in Sweden that took in the highest number of asylum seekers and those where the highest number of sexual offences was reported.Attempts to interview a Brå spokesperson were unsuccessful on Wednesday. The full study can be read (in Swedish) via this link.For Jerzy Sarnecki, a criminology professor at Stockholm University who audited the report, the Brå study was enough to put to rest the idea that the increase in rape cases is directly tied to the influx of refugees."We are not facing an occupation by Muslim men who rape our women," Sarnecki told Dagens Nyheter. "The report shows that the immigration influx has not affected the number of sexual offences."Sarnecki instead concludes that changing attitudes toward what constitutes sexual assault are a driving factor behind the increase in reported incidents."It's clear that there is less tolerance for certain types of sexual offenses that may have not previously been reported," he said.Given the controversy that surrounds Sweden's rape statistics both within the country and without, it perhaps not surprising that Brå cautions against making sweeping conclusions from its report."It is not possible to give a definitive answer to how the developments within these two sources [NTU and police statistics, ed.] should be interpreted," the report reads.The Brå report came just one day after Sweden's Public Health Agency released the results of a nationwide survey that revealed widespread sexual harassment and assault.
9:56 pm
March 30, 2018
Offline
I think local news channels in Sweden are a pretty legit source
if its on the local news and the local news are stating that Swedish women are getting raped at record rates after they let in way too many muslims as they should have is not a coincidence.
I posted a video of 60 minutes going to a no go zone the police refuse to enter with them and they get assaulted and ran over by cars drove by muslims.
let in a couple 1000 at a time let them integrate but not hundreds of thousands at once its just a bad idea.
the koran is a bad book to follow and these people follow that book as law not any law that the country they enter has they just follow the koran.
THE ALMIGHTY SMACK
10:01 pm
September 18, 2012
Offline
the_great_white_smack said
I think local news channels in Sweden are a pretty legit sourceif its on the local news and the local news are stating that Swedish women are getting raped at record rates after they let in way too many muslims as they should have is not a coincidence.
I posted a video of 60 minutes going to a no go zone the police refuse to enter with them and they get assaulted and ran over by cars drove by muslims.
let in a couple 1000 at a time let them integrate but not hundreds of thousands at once its just a bad idea.
the koran is a bad book to follow and these people follow that book as law not any law that the country they enter has they just follow the koran.
So you're taking this source at face value because it backs up a pre-existing view and not reading the Snopes article because it completely dismantles your claim.
That's what Krunk calls thinking for yourself. AKA what thoughtful people call, confirmation bias.
It's okay, I still love you. Islam says that god is in all of us or something and I love Allah. HotSalamiBacon.
10:02 pm
August 10, 2017
Offline
Dude, your gonna get crazy deals on prayer rugs. It wont be all bad.
Yeah bitches, im that short gentleman mentioned in that youtube video.
And the very nice, level headed guy from that other youtube video.
10:04 pm
March 30, 2018
Offline
actually islam says to kill any non believer on site
THE ALMIGHTY SMACK
10:10 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
Offline
All religions can be used to support violence except Jainism.
10:34 pm
May 4, 2014
Offline
What I call thinking for myself is not deciding things based on any news source, but mixing it up with humans in person and seeing things firsthand. In my genius school I went to Wet 'n Wild with a Muslim who wore a bikini, & watched my grandpa chase away an Iranian trying to get me into his Trans Am when I was 13. Probably why I married into a mercenary family that lived in Saudi Arabia for a while. Enjoy ur black mirrors, but I'll be the one in the deep end at the real party. Peace be upon u, cunts.
YouTube Video Islamic remix dance
|
|
|
10:37 pm
September 18, 2012
Offline
the_great_white_smack said
actually islam says to kill any non believer on site
Can you actually cite this? I'm looking for a specific verse that actually says this and all I'm finding is the part that says killing one person is like killing all of humanity.
10:41 pm
September 18, 2012
Offline
krunkazphuk said
What I call thinking for myself is not deciding things based on any news source, but mixing it up with humans in person and seeing things firsthand. In my genius school I went to Wet 'n Wild with a Muslim who wore a bikini, & watched my grandpa chase away an Iranian trying to get me into his Trans Am when I was 13. Probably why I married into a mercenary family that lived in Saudi Arabia for a while. Enjoy ur black mirrors, but I'll be the one in the deep end at the real party. Peace be upon u, cunts.YouTube Video Islamic remix dance
Nah, you'll be on faygo luvers wasting your time on stupidity like the rest of us, oh enlightened one.
HotSalamiBacon.
10:45 pm
March 30, 2018
Offline
King Lucem Ferre said
Can you actually cite this? I'm looking for a specific verse that actually says this and all I'm finding is the part that says killing one person is like killing all of humanity.
“Lord…Give us victory over the unbelievers.” Quran 2:286
“Lord…give us victory over the unbelievers.” Quran 3:147
“I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers.” Quran 8:12
“Let not the unbelievers think they will ever get away. They have not the power so to do. Muster against them all the men and cavalry at your command, so that you may strike terror into the enemy of Allah and your enemy…” Quran 8:59-60
“When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” Quran 9:5
“Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: an evil fate.” Quran 9:73
“Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. Know that God is with the righteous.” Quran 9:123
“Believers, take neither the Jews nor the Christians for your friends. They are friends with one another…” Quran 5:51
“He that chooses a religion over Islam, it will not be accepted from him and in the world to come he will be one of the lost.” Quran 3:85
“Let not believers make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful – he that does this has nothing to hope for from Good – except in self-defense. God admonishes you to fear Him: for to God shall all return.” Quran 3:28
“Garments of fire have been prepared for the unbelievers. Scalding water shall be poured upon their heads, melting their skins and that which is in their bellies. They shall be lashed with rods of iron.
“Whenever, in their anguish, they try to escape from Hell, back they shall be dragged, and will be told: ‘Taste the torment of the Conflagration!'” Quran 22:19-20
“Muhammad is God’s apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.” Quran 48:29
“Those that deny Our revelations We will burn in fire. No sooner will their skins be consumed than We shall give them other skins, so that they may truly taste the scourge. God is mighty and wise.” Quran 4:56
THE ALMIGHTY SMACK
10:51 pm
September 18, 2012
Offline
I can always count on you to dig up dirt on the Mozzies, Smack.
I have to be honest, I didn't go past the first page of google I didn't care.
HotSalamiBacon!!
10:52 pm
August 10, 2017
Offline
Hotsalamibacon LMAO. Just caught that, sorry.
Whoop Whoop Drunkalo :
King Lucem FerreYeah bitches, im that short gentleman mentioned in that youtube video.
And the very nice, level headed guy from that other youtube video.
11:31 pm
April 25, 2017
Offline
The only think KLF is guilty of is projection. His sources are perfect and only everyone else's is wrong and "biased." "Biased" is a loaded term anyway that means nothing other than "wrong" or "incorrect" or "missing key data." This bit makes me laugh.
"Shit talk Islam all you want. Islam is trash. The bible is trash. Christianity is trash. Judaism is trash. What’s happening in the middle east is trash. Just don’t be a bigot and pretend that this means everybody that believes in all of those trash religions are the same kind of trash is all I ask."
And here we go with the false equivalence. KLF and any other regressive liberal that would welcome Islam into their country and Muslims as a majority and put trannyjuggalette in harms way, are a danger to the people they claim to protect. Their moral compass is no longer "does it protect women, gays, little girls," it's rather "does this piss off and concern a straight liberal white man?" The false equivalence is astounding. They claim all religions are the same and all those who practice Christianity, Judaism and Islam are the same, but yet they can't show where in Judeo-Christian liberal western countries that Jews and Christians are engaging in acid attacks, first cousin incest and chopping little girls' clits due to religion. It doesn't exist. Muslims seem to be the only immigrants that do this shit. But fake liberals don't care. KLF is the type that would dox a closeted gay atheist Muslim and expose him to fellow Muslims who would kill him, just to satisfy his ego that he isn't racist. Why? Because slavery and the holocaust and Nazis. That's why. People like KLF are simpletons pretending to be smart.
11:32 pm
February 16, 2018
Offline
the_great_white_smack said
actually islam says to kill any non believer on site
Yeeaaah, no, it says that non-believers must submit to islam and pay a tax known as Jizya If they stand against you they are to be killed, but you don't kill them on sight, how would that even work?
How would you get more believers if you just fucking killed everyone?
What you are supposed to do, is conquer them, and they either join your religion, die, or pay Jizya.
If the ENTIRE WORLD was paying their Jizya and submitting to Islam, if they were strictly following the Quaran, they wouldn't do things like terrorist attacks.
If you attempt to leave Islam you are to be killed, but they don't kill non-believers on sight.
I see no difference between a corpse and a sex toy
11:33 pm
April 25, 2017
Offline
Pigg said
Vinyl do you have any sources that AREN'T non-credible blogs, far right think tanks, far right news sites, or conspiracy sites?
As I was skimming I saw:
Gateston Institute (a far right think tank known for its anti-islam articles)
Breitbart (a far right news site that has posted factually inaccurate information)
Do you have anything besides baseless slander and ad hominem fallacies designed to poison the well? How about something real.
11:37 pm
February 16, 2018
Offline
Edit because I didn't get to edit because Vinyl posted like 2 seconds after me,
All the things you read were true, but all the things about making war and never taking them as your friend, and defeating them, it's not fucking genocide, which "kill non-believers" would imply, it's supremacy.
Conquer them, tax them, convert them, and you may never befriend or become them.
I see no difference between a corpse and a sex toy
11:40 pm
February 16, 2018
Offline
King Lucem Ferre said
Shit talk Islam all you want. Islam is trash. The bible is trash. Christianity is trash. Judaism is trash. What’s happening in the middle east is trash. Just don’t be a bigot and pretend that this means everybody that believes in all of those trash religions are the same kind of trash is all I ask. Or fear mongering to keep people trying to escape the trash of Islam from doing so.
Of course I'd never act like every Muslim is the same.
I used an example just a bit ago with Christianity, the Church that hosts the LGBT youth club 10 minutes from me and the Westboro baptist church both claim they believe in the same book, they're both "Christians" but they have exactly zero views in common.
The progressive Muslims you see in Ted Talks and shit, they have NOTHING in common with the guys blowing themselves.
Just like my fucking dad has nothing in common with the KKK even though they are both technically protestants.
Now, I make fun of everyone involved but that's because I'm an asshole, I in no way think that people, even in the same damn sect, shit, even going to the same mosque or church, are the same kind of trash.
And now that you've got my brain going, here's a short explanation of Cherry Picking
Okay, Cherry Picking Cherry Picking only begins after someone has actively accepted their chosen religion as the objective truth, and, more importantly, after they have accepted their religion as the objective source of Morality, because Cherry Picking that is non-moral based is pretty much completely unimportant. So, what happens is that, they believe their religion is what is morally right, BUT, because of that, they will reject notions told to them about their religion that does not comply with that THEY view as right. To word that better, lets say, by whatever external factors that resulted in it, whether your own empathy or how you were raised, you know that there's nothing wrong with being gay. But then, in church, someone tells you that it IS wrong to be gay. One of two things will happen when someone is confronted with something that goes against what they naturally thought. So to continue with that example. They will either reject the notion that it is sinful and believe that the teacher was incorrect, that it is okay to be gay but the pastor was wrong, or, they will compromise their beliefs and change depending on their teaching, saying it is wrong to be gay. So, at the end of the day, because there are so many sects and teachings, your beliefs you end with will be a combination of what you would have believed regardless of your religion and what your religion actually teaches. The percentage of what came from you and what came from the book will depend on who you are as a person. When somebody "Turns" to a religion for guidance, what that is has a few ways of panning out depending on where it's coming from. One common source is a feeling of moral emptiness, having your views on what is right and wrong, but not feeling any absolutes in it which, for some people drives them insane, so they'll look to a religion to validate those beliefs, but will most likely have some of their beliefs changed by the texts. Another source is feeling completely morally lost, having no substantial idea of what you believe in, usually after something happened that changed your prospective, so you go to a religion to get NEW ideas, it'll still be influenced by who you are what you ultimately "find" but I word this like it all makes sense to do, and well, it makes sense why people do it, but at the end of the day IT'S STILL FUCKING STUPID. No matter what you are avoiding things that are written in the text you claim is objective fact. And that DOESN'T even mean always just ignoring rules, people will make them up to and use loose vague comparisons to make them make sense. People will write books upon books upon books of apologetics to explain away the stuff they don't want to belief and bolster the stuff they do want to believe, the mental gymnastics are downright funny at times. Either that, or they will outright avoid ever mentally acknowledging the pages they want to avoid. And EITHER ONE, no matter how you slice it is stupid. And I did this shit too when I wasn't on anti-psychotics, but I did this on STEROIDS I was a "Satanic Theorist", I believed that the bible was propaganda piece from god who was a corrupt tyrant, and so, I would find a way to make ALL of my beliefs with no exception everything the bible said that I believed was wrong "EVIL PROPAGANDA", everything that the bible said that I believed was right "Oh, he needs to maintain some order among his people". But at the VERY LEAST I will always be able to say, I never pretended a page didn't exist. And it's actually because I did that that I know so much about the bible now, I studied it more as a satanist than I did as a christian, because I was no longer afraid of what I'd see, I wanted to see all of it. But because I did that so much, I also realize how laughable it is. Cherry Picking speaks nothing to if you're a good person, how you act is the only definer of if you're a good person, Cherry Picking is why people who believe in a disgusting religion are even capable of being good people.
I see no difference between a corpse and a sex toy
All RSSMost Users Ever Online: 591
Currently Online:
81 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
The Warlock: 11663
King Lucem Ferre: 9098
Old Mr Dangerous: 8974
krunk: 8060
OCJ_Brendan: 6148
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 755
Members: 3743
Moderators: 6
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 5
Forums: 28
Topics: 12299
Posts: 245363
Newest Members:
Philipesodo, JaneHor, THC Drinks, Jammek, GloriaIcomeModerators: GanjaGoblin: 2873, Psyral: 4297, bozodklown: 394, scruffy: 11447, PunkRockJuggalo: 6559, Pigg: 6492
Administrators: admin: 1, ScottieD: 845
