the_patriot_smack said
he was found guilty of sexual assault 

Does Smack the pedophile expert see any red flags? 

Still no comment? I figured Smack, our inhouse pedophile expert, would have something to say about these documents. Sometimes silence says it all, am I right? 

the_patriot_smack said 
he was found guilty of sexual assault 

That Sound You Hear Is Donald Trump Screaming, Crying, and Throwing Up in a Mar-a-Lago Bathroom

Donald Trump received some no good, extremely bad legal news on Friday, when The Guardian reported that Fani Willis, the Fulton County district attorney criminally inestigating his attempt to overturn the 2020 electio in Georgia has “developed evidence to charge a sprwling racketeering indictment next month,” according to people familiar with the matter. Obviously, being charged with racketeering would be exactly as bad as it sounds, and yet somehow, that wasn’t even te worst news the ex-president recived.

Instead, it was likely the decision by Aileen Cannon, a federal judge Trump himself appointed, to set a trial date of May 20, 2024, for Trump to face off with the federal government in the classified-documents case, that had staffers and aides hiding in hallways and coat closets to avoid Trump’s ire (and whatever ketchup bottles he could get his hands on). While the spring date is several months later than prosecutors had requested, it is very much well before the postelection one Team Trump had been angling for in the hopes of putting it off until the ex-president could have won a second term and made all of his legal problems on the federal level, that is, go away.

Of course, just because Cannon issued a ruling that Trump will undoubtedly be very unhappy about today does not mean she won’t, as many fear, blow up the case in his favor when the trial finally kicks off. (As The Washington Post notes, “In her role, Cannon can have a significant impact on the case, including by ruling on what evidence can be included and deciding on any potential motions challenging the charges.”) On the other hand, the government’s indictment against Trump is said to be extremely strong: After the charges were unveiled last month, former attorney general Bill Barr opined: “I was shocked by the degree of sensitivity of these documents and how many there were, frankly. If even half of it is true, he’s toast.” As one Fox News legal analyst noted, “All the government has to do is stick the landing on one count, and he could have a terminal sentence. We’re talking about crimes that have a 10- or 20-year period as a maximum.” (Trump, along with his alleged co-conspirator, has pleaded not guilty.)

Incidentally, the documents case isn’t even the first criminal trial that Trump will have to fit into his schedule next spring. His trial versus the Manhattan district attorney, who charged him in April with various crimes related to his hush money deals, is slated to begin March 25, three weeks after Super Tuesday. (Trump has also pleaded not guilty in that case.)

In related news, The Washington Post reports that Trump’s many legal issues, including the New York case, the DOJ’s documents case, and the possible Georgia case, and the DOJ’s election interference case that he's expected to be charged in, are eating into a huge amount of campaign funds:

To illustrate how Trump’s criminal defense is swallowing his campaign, just over half of the money he raised last quarter went not to the campaign itself but to an affiliated PAC that is footing the legal bills. Of more than $35 million raised between March and June, the campaign received $17.7 million, according to the latest report to the Federal Election Commission. The rest went to the Save America PAC, which will report its latest finances on July 31 but has been spending millions on lawyers representing Trump and allies in the multiple ongoing cases, according to FEC disclosures.

“A lot of money is going to legal and people who don’t do much, and not a lot is left over to do marketing and advertising,” said one Trump adviser, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal plans. “A lot of the money we’re raising is just going to legal.”

And if you’re thinking perhaps Trump was chipping in at least a little bit of his own money for his legal fees, think again. According to the Post, the former guy “is not relying on his personal fortune to cover his legal bills.” (You expected Trump pay for this shit out of pocket like some kind of commoner? C’mon now.)

Ken Cuccinelli, who is advising a Ron DeSantis aligned super PAC told the Post: “Trump’s supporters are being taken advantage of by having to foot the bill for Trump’s legal troubles.” A spokesperson for Trump’s campaign told the outlet the campaign is paying Trump’s legal bills because the ex-president and his supporters believe that he is only being prosecuted because Joe Biden is trying to stop him from becoming president. “They see another political indictment or target letter and they know this is just the weaponized Biden Justice Department going after President Trump,” he said. “It solidifies in their mind what the President has been saying for all these months. So much of the legal messaging is political messaging and so much of political messaging is legal messaging.” Biden said last month he “never once, not one single time, suggested to the Justice Department what they should do or not do relative to bringing a charge or not bringing a charge.”

Per: Vanity Fair

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/07/donald-trump-fulton-county-racketeering-documents-trial-date

the_patriot_smack said
 I do not believe her at all.

the_patriot_smack said
he was found guilty of sexual assault

I wonder which one of these statements will carry more weight with American public? Most people have a negative opinion of sexual assault but on the other hand, Smack doesn't believe her. Tough call. I guess we could break it down like this:

 I do not believe her at all.

Is a subjective opinion. Those are common as assholes, and worth less than nothing. No one cares who Smack is or what he believes. 

he was found guilty of sexual assault

Now that's an objective fact. No matter who you are, Trump was found guilty of sexual assault. See how easy this is? Say it with me now...

the_patriot_smack said
he was found guilty of sexual assault 

the_patriot_smack said
answer me that and answer it from the heart

I'm flattered, but no thank you. Go sniff another dog's ass.

My life will be better when our inhouse pedophile expert finally comments one these documents. What were these perverts thinking? 

the_patriot_smack said
he was found guilty of sexual assault 

Ask a Trekke about Star Trek and they can talk about the franchise for hours.

Ask a Juggalo about ICP and they can talk about the group for days.  

Ask a "Trump supporter" about Trump and all they can talk about is Joe Biden, Mexico, fentanyl, soyboys, BRICS-based dollar, China, bellwether states, transgenders, Google, oil drilling, Zoom, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, boosters, Vladimir Putin, Jim Biden, Amazon, gas prices, Disney, God, Visa, TDS, Paypal, Blazay Rose, Jussie Smollete, Zarna Yoshi, Nintendo America, guest, Islamaphobia, 84%, Canada, Microsoft, Kamala Harris, the French language, Jonas LeClaque, God's children, the Titanic, Tara Reade, the Taliban, PGA, Uber, Hunter Biden, George Soros and the petrodollar.

Most of them can't actually talk about Donald Trump for five straight minutes. I wonder why? Are the mental gymnastics that difficult? Does sucking his dick for too long leave a bitter aftertaste? What's the deal? 

the_patriot_smack said
he was found guilty of sexual assault

the_patriot_smack said
I am not a Democrat or a Liberal only they support child predators

Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.

https://www.beaconjournal.com/story/news/state/2012/09/28/ex-lawmaker-convicted-sex-offenses/10661155007/