lol duder, nobody cares and it’s not even that big of news. So, cool story brah.

Hey guys, water is wet.  Or is it?  Hear me out.

So a lot of people think water is wet because when you touch it, it feels wet.  However Aristotle once said “The premisses of demonstrative knowledge must be true, primary, immediate, more knowable than and prior to the conclusion, which is further related to them as effect to cause… The premisses must be the cause of the conclusion, more knowable than it, and prior to it; its causes, since we posses scientific knowledge of a thing only when we know its cause; prior, in order to be causes; antecedently known, this antecedent knowledge being not our mere understanding of the meaning, but knowledge of the fact as well. Now ‘prior’ and ‘more knowable’ are ambiguous terms, for there is a difference between what is prior and more knowable in the order of being and what is prior and knowable to man. I mean that objects nearer to sense are prior and more knowable to man; objects without qualification prior and more knowable are those further from sense. Now the most universal causes are furthest from sense and particular causes are nearest to sense, and they are thus exactly opposed to each other.”

Furthermore, he goes on to state “There is… something which is in energy only; and there is something which is both in energy and capacity. …of relatives, one is predicated as according to excess and defect: another according to the effective and passive, and, in short, the motive, and that which may be moved… Motion, however, has not a substance separate from things… But each of the categories subsists in a twofold manner in all things. Thus… one thing pertaining to it is form, and another privation. …So the species of motion and mutation are as many as those of being. But since in every genus of things, there is that which is in entelecheia, and that which is in capacity; motion is the entelecheia of that which is in capacity… That there is energy, therefore, and that a thing then happens to be moved, when this energy exists, and neither prior nor posterior to it, is manifest. … [N]either motion nor mutation can be placed in any other genus; nor have those who have advanced a different opinion concerning it spoken rightly. …for by some motion is said to be difference, inequality, and non-being; though it is not necessary that any of these should be moved… Neither is mutation into these, nor from these, rather than from their opposites. …The cause, however, why motion appears to be indefinite, is because it can neither be simply referred to the capacity, nor to the energy of beings. …[I]t is difficult to apprehend what motion is: for it is necessary to refer it either to privation, or to capacity, or to simple energy; but it does not appear that it can be any of these. The above-mentioned mode, therfore remains, viz. that it is a certain energy; but… difficult to be perceived, but which may have a subsistence.”

Seems crazy, right?  Well if you really think about it, you have skin.  This skin is on your entire body.  It’s kinda like when you walk down a long hallway to get from one location to another, but it’s really nothing like that at all because we’re not talking about hallways.  We’re talking about water you bigass jaba tubba the lub.  That’s water that creates wetness.  Or in essence it’s much easier than you would really think.

Just click play.  This will show you what most people think about when they close their eyes and zone out while sitting at a particularly long red light

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqhZlROgpNY

This article further reinforces that point if you just skip down approximately 47 lines and then go into the 4th word right after it stops talking about gerbil rectums: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/from-gere-to-eternity-2/

A lot of people will say this is a farce.  Hell no it isn’t.  Just carefully examine this quote and tell me where I’m wrong.  I double dog dare you even though I know I can’t because this argument doesn’t have a particular opinion.  It’s both the tinder and lit match of an impending flame war and each side can be contradicted indefinitely without picking a side.  K, here’s the quote “What is called the Law of Nations is not properly law, but a part of ethics: a set of moral rules, accepted as authoritative by civilized states. It is true that these rules neither are nor ought to be of eternal obligation, but do and must vary more or less from age to age, as the consciences of nations become more enlightened, and the exigences of political society undergo change. But the rules mostly were at their origin, and still are, an application of the maxims of honesty and humanity to the intercourse of states. They were introduced by the moral sentiments of mankind, or by their sense of the general interest, to mitigate the crimes and sufferings of a state of war, and to restrain governments and nations from unjust or dishonest conduct towards one another in time of peace. Since every country stands in numerous and various relations with the other countries of the world, and many, our own among the number, exercise actual authority over some of these, a knowledge of the established rules of international morality is essential to the duty of every nation, and therefore of every person in it who helps to make up the nation, and whose voice and feeling form a part of what is called public opinion. Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject. It depends on the habit of attending to and looking into public transactions, and on the degree of information and solid judgment respecting them that exists in the community, whether the conduct of the nation as a nation, both within itself and towards others, shall be selfish, corrupt, and tyrannical, or rational and enlightened, just and noble.”

Yea, bitch, it’s ain’t wet.  It’s a thing that makes things wet.  That’s like saying a thermometer is really hot, you fucking fruit loop.

Now, here’s a 10 hour video of my thought process while watching people try to disprove absolutely nothing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1hmDYnbasI

I should have, lol.  I was just going googling stupid shit about a pointless topic that it actually debated (seriously).  Then adding in long quotes that have nothing to do with that but kinda sound like they could if you want them to.  That wall of text took me all of 5 minutes to construct

😈17 becomes obvious soon😈

Link’s holy trinity will look different!

write a book!

backstabber said
write a book!  

Read a book.

vinyllover said

The 17%r is clearly still bitter.

Totes

DemonicSwagger said
I came here to learn more about Mexican Batman lol  

I heard that yesterday

gave

an atomic bat wedgie and hung him by his drawers from one of the border wall prototypes in Commiefornia. Seems legit.