the_cossack_smack said
...and Milo is a very special kind of gay the kind of gay that hate's everything that comes after the LG and the kind of gay that stands up for and respects for the strait people of the world.  

Milo is a huge reason a chunk of Libertarians and Republicans voted for Trump. In his events, he talked about the number one reason to vote for Trump was the Supreme Court picks. The SC was breaking away from constitutional interpretation of laws and was starting to interpret laws based of what they thought was the right thing to do. Trump was needed to swing it away from interpretations based on feelings.

Trump has pushed beyond that and also stacked things like the 9th district courts with constitutionalism. Very necessary, in my opinion, since the alarming trend was a judiciary branch that was legislating from the bench instead of interpreting legislation. 

Anyway. I am a big fan of Milo. The internet super villain. The ring leader of Gamer Gate. And as he calls himself, the dangerous faggot. He used to work at the UN for climate legislation until he saw what was really going on with it. 

Noah Fence said
...But you do you, boo bear. You scream and cry about how homophobic Muslims are while you rot that mensa brain on your q anon bullshit about how the gays are molesting children.   

She's not really into Q. That would be me. But not the anon speculations around Q. Just the direct Q drops. He or she has never mentioned gays or anything like that. Never mentions religion or race anything of the sort. What a lot of people attribute to Q is not Q but rather things from people who discuss Q. Q started out as a Socratic experiment that blossomed into something beyond that. What it has become to most is now not a very productive avenue to go down. ... The "raw" Q is still good. Good direction. Good information (well not actually info, just questions). The rest of the movement has devolved into a mess. 

Is Q some inside official with secrets? Probably not. That doesn't matter to me, though. I use the drops for the original purposes and leave all the "chan-y" stuff to anons who will never fully understand the purpose. It's a mental exercise that we choose to play. It is expansive and mind challenging. As I have said before, a game. To play it is to walk a path that most will never see before them. Most see it as justification for whatever they feel they need to justify. The ones who understand the game will play, knowing it is seen as silly by those on the outside. 

Doesn't matter.

The game is being played.

This is not a game.

Who want's to play a game.

No one gets a free pass who plays the game.

Enjoy the show.

...

BTW. We are now in the 5th phase of the "game". This is the time of darkness. We are beyond the [5][10][20]. Past the 11:11. Over the [5]:[5]. ... The clock has been wound. The timeline's been accelerated and the mirror is set. Every "piece" has been placed and nothing more. The names are familiar but represent concepts, not people. It's a literary "cant" that is learned and taught in participation.

To take it all too seriously will lead down the wrong path. It's just a game. It's just a show. It does have consequences. 

Psyral Infection said

the_cossack_smack said
...and Milo is a very special kind of gay the kind of gay that hate's everything that comes after the LG and the kind of gay that stands up for and respects for the strait people of the world.  

Milo is a huge reason a chunk of Libertarians and Republicans voted for Trump. In his events, he talked about the number one reason to vote for Trump was the Supreme Court picks. The SC was breaking away from constitutional interpretation of laws and was starting to interpret laws based of what they thought was the right thing to do. Trump was needed to swing it away from interpretations based on feelings.

Trump has pushed beyond that and also stacked things like the 9th district courts with constitutionalism. Very necessary, in my opinion, since the alarming trend was a judiciary branch that was legislating from the bench instead of interpreting legislation. 

Anyway. I am a big fan of Milo. The internet super villain. The ring leader of Gamer Gate. And as he calls himself, the dangerous faggot. He used to work at the UN for climate legislation until he saw what was really going on with it.   

Honestly , at this point you feel like the only person on the other side that I feel like it is constructive to have a conversation with.

My question is...

How can we tell the difference between people who are interpreting the Constitution, and people who are determining it in ways that agree with our point of view?

Another, separate question (for everyone): are there parts of our constitution that should be changed? We have amendments for a reason.

People outside of the US, I appreciate your perspective.

Even smack. There are many things that are happening in the states that would be prohibited by the Canadian charter of rights.