2:37 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
3:18 pm
May 4, 2014
Comey, as an unelected official, seems to have usurped the DOJ. He was a cop (who in his spare time was an attorney) who was supposed to gather evidence, not prosecute. He was a catcher who decided he was a pitcher. Joe DiGenova sums it up concisely:
YouTube Video Joe DiGenova: Comey is a danger to this country
And in advance, this is for any motherfuckers triggered by reality:
6:46 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
krunkazphuk said
Comey, as an unelected official, seems to have usurped the DOJ. He was a cop (who in his spare time was an attorney) who was supposed to gather evidence, not prosecute. He was a catcher who decided he was a pitcher. Joe DiGenova sums it up concisely:
YouTube Video Joe DiGenova: Comey is a danger to this country
And in advance, this is for any motherfuckers triggered by reality:
So you think it was because he didn't reccommend charges for Hillary? Or am I misunderstanding?
7:03 pm
Moderators
February 15, 2014
He fired Comey because I told him to.
Actually , my opinion is that he fired Comey because, as revealed in his testimony, Comey told Trump on 3 occasions that Trump was not under investigation, but Comey kept letting the media run with the story even though (again as he said in the testimony) that he knew it was entirely untrue.
Just my opinion.
10:24 pm
May 4, 2014
Pigg said
So you think it was because he didn't reccommend charges for Hillary? Or am I misunderstanding?
I don't think it was Comey's place to recommend charges against Clinton; it was the DOJ's. I see him as a fall guy, a diversion from Lynch's corruption. Beyond what I see as his mishandling of the Clinton investigation (or "matter" as he says Lynch instructed him to call it) he seems to have politicized the FBI. They're glorified cops, with "Investigation" in the name. "...the FBI does not have the job of deciding who should, or should not, be prosecuted for crime. It was created to do investigations – period. When it finishes one of its probes, it can and usually does make recommendations, but someone else has the job of deciding what to do with the results of those investigations – an actual prosecutor..."
12:28 am
Members
August 6, 2013
But the public may not always understand that the FBI does not have the job of deciding who should, or should not, be prosecuted for crime. It was created to do investigations – period. When it finishes one of its probes, it can and usually does make recommendations, but someone else has the job of deciding what to do with the results of those investigations – an actual prosecutor.
Krunk, this is from the link you shared. Wouldn't this mean it was his place to recommend charges?
To Psyral and Krunk, why do you think the White House changed the rationale behind the firing of Comey?
6:53 am
Moderators
February 15, 2014
Pigg said
...To Psyral and Krunk, why do you think the White House changed the rationale behind the firing of Comey?
Again, Because I told him to.
Again, just my opinion... I think there was more than one reason he was fired. Depending on which day you ask, they give another reason from the list. My favorite reason is when Lynch asked Comey to lie, he did. When Trump asked Comey to tell the truth, he refused. (Yes, I know this came out during the Comey testimony after he was fired. But still a good reason in retrospect.)
And a nicely done vid on Comey-Clinton:
7:04 am
Members
August 6, 2013
7:41 am
Moderators
February 15, 2014
Pigg said
I think there was more than one reason he was fired. Depending on which day you ask, they give another reason from the list.
If this were the case, don't you think they would have just listed all of the reasons from the get go? It would have saved them a whole lot of grief with the press.
Maybe. I also thinks the admin likes to get the press all riled up. Trump used this during the election by saying things he knew the press would dissect and run with, giving him free airtime. Trump plays a long game of 4D chess
8:27 am
May 4, 2014
Pigg said
But the public may not always understand that the FBI does not have the job of deciding who should, or should not, be prosecuted for crime. It was created to do investigations – period. When it finishes one of its probes, it can and usually does make recommendations, but someone else has the job of deciding what to do with the results of those investigations – an actual prosecutor.
Krunk, this is from the link you shared. Wouldn't this mean it was his place to recommend charges?
To Psyral and Krunk, why do you think the White House changed the rationale behind the firing of Comey?
To clarify, recommendations by cops are irrelevant. The FBI can or cannot recommend whatever it likes, & it's the prosecutors' job in the DOJ to pursue a case. Comey was paraded around to distract from the Clinton cartel and Lynch. I don't see the White House doing anything abnormal. I think they axed Comey because he doesn't seem to be a team player; he's a bloody pebble in a bloody shoe, a megalomaniac, he needed to move bitch, get out tha way, etc...
Pigg said
If this were the case, don't you think they would have just listed all of the reasons from the get go? It would have saved them a whole lot of grief with the press.
I think the press is being given enough rope to hang itself. Bring on the grief. It's just clickbait for victims to whine about while the alphas strengthen our world.
6:44 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
8:00 pm
May 4, 2014
Pigg said
According to recent polls, Trump's approval rating is at 38% compared to. The 47% that support his impeachment. Do you think there's any possible way that this bad press is actually having a negative effect?
Midterm elections in 2018 & the next presidential run in 2020 will demonstrate the answer to that. It's probably easier for some Americans to gratuitously throw around terms like "Nazi" and to fear Russia rather than recognize clear, present threats like ISIS (and communism.) The MSM at this point seems little more than a designer drug, so it should be a real carnival when America develops a tolerance and moves on to the next drug of choice. I like that Trump's more Mr. Blonde than Mr. Nice Guy.
11:05 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
9:34 am
May 4, 2014
Pigg said
Why are you so distrusting of most major news sources?
It's not a matter of trust. I enjoy some of the raw footage of current events. I'm a skeptic trained in the scientific method/critical thinking, & the various sources seem to mostly editorialize, contradict each other (and themselves), and push agendas like the Paris Agreement as science when they're clearly not. I don't
but make up my own damned mind. It's fun. Maybe try it.
2:05 pm
July 28, 2016
2:19 pm
May 4, 2014
Most Users Ever Online: 591
Currently Online:
49 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
The Warlock: 11663
King Lucem Ferre: 9098
Old Mr Dangerous: 8974
krunk: 8060
OCJ_Brendan: 6148
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 755
Members: 3743
Moderators: 6
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 5
Forums: 28
Topics: 12299
Posts: 245363
Newest Members:
JaneHor, THC Drinks, Jammek, GloriaIcomeModerators: GanjaGoblin: 2873, Psyral: 4297, bozodklown: 394, scruffy: 11447, PunkRockJuggalo: 6559, Pigg: 6492
Administrators: admin: 1, ScottieD: 845