Thank you @psyral-infection for that option!  I’m one of the people that only get on here at work, and I like Lucem, but his god damn signature was horrible for people that look at this site during work.  My work is super lax with internet use, but there’s been a few times someone would walk by and be like…..”oh nice butts”  No matter how lax the workplace is, those comments suck.  lol Anyway mad props for this.

krunkazphuk said
Jesus; I don’t know if I want to live in a world where fried mac-n-cheese is the new porn.

  

I’d stick my dick in some mac n cheese.

Is there a way to hide pictures? Because our signatures won’t be the only sexual pictures on here. People like to post weird shit about fucking lambs and goats and shit on here.

Either way, I don’t really post in the forums much anyways, if I do start again I’ll consider changing my signature if it’s still an issue.

I thought even straight women and gay men could appreciate a good booty……

@nyro, you know what they say about trannies, right? it’s not a dick it’s a handle to hold while you fuck her in the ass

there is another message board I post on that has a text only version. if you go to it you have to click on the thumbnail to actually see anything and anything else is text. is there way to do that with whatever you guys use to run this forum @scottied @psyral-infection ?

I am just saying, isn’t liking butts a requirement for gay men? The only people I could see offended by lucem sig is maybe feminists.

You wouldn’t even know half those booty shots weren’t cross dressing men if it didn’t have text and still even then a few are subject to judgement 

Mr. Tidwell said

I don’t think anybody was complaining that they didn’t like it, just that it was “too sexual”.  

I need to read the morality rule book again. I missed the bar on what is and isn’t too sexualized nowadays.

We just watched zootopia that Disney movie and there are definitely innuendos in it.

If Disney can put innuendos in a g rated movie there is no reason I should not be allowed to post a pic of my hairy unmanscapped sack on a juggalo forum if I wanted to. 

Not to mention the giant cock tower on the original little mermaid cover. 

I can accept the NSFW excuse but there is no such thing as too sexual on the internet is there? I may just be a morally corrupt piece of shit or something because I just don’t get it I guess.

It’s not even gay porn on his signature. Just guys kissing and one or two embracing each other. It could be the cover of a gay Nicolas Sparks novel or something.

It’s not like its a dude taking a load in the face.

I say rep it loud and proud ninja. I am not gonna try and shove you in the closet.

Uhh

Nyro said
My balls could be considered a scientific or biological picture. Therefor who is to say it is pornographic and not simply educational?  

You can do that. But keep in mind there are no genitals in my picture and if you think a couple of people kissing is the same as genitals… I really hope you don’t ever kiss your moms.