Log In
Sign Up
Home
Related Topics
7:03 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
Offline
the_blackface_smack said
I don't like that Greta bitchbut I still do believe in global warming
this was a Monday
and this was Tuesday
even if it is true I do not believe the world is over in 12 years maybe 120 years but not 12
It's not that the world will END in 12 years.
It's more like we'll be past the point of being able to slow down warming in 12 years.
And it's actually happening FASTER than scientists previously thought.
8:45 pm
March 30, 2018
Offline
I will be 50 in 12 years and here's some stuff I won't be doing in the next 12 years
buying a green car
stop smoking
stop eating steaks
stop drinking milk everyday
as a matter of fact I bought plastic straws in bulk they are 100 for $1 at any dollarama I bought me 1000 because fuck those paper straws they just feel weird on the lips.
but I hardly drive anymore I got a bus and metro pass but that's just because I hate driving and I am an asshole and get road rage during traffic
and I drink tap water fuck watered bottle never pay for what you can get for free like water and pussy
and that dickless muslim Justin Trudeau forced me to use a reusable bag because there ain't no plastic bags anymore in the whole city on Montreal so I need to bring my own bag when I buy my beer
if the world ends I blame the democrats their cities are full of garbage,shit and heroin needles
and I started this thread way back in 2015 when I was the most whooped member
THE ALMIGHTY SMACK
9:16 pm
Moderators
February 15, 2014
Offline
Pigg said
It's not that the world will END in 12 years.
It's more like we'll be past the point of being able to slow down warming in 12 years.
And it's actually happening FASTER than scientists previously thought.
Show me the raw data on this, please.
I tend to not believe the predictions.
And Greta the puppet came here for purely political reasons. The U.S.? Talking about getting more people registered to vote to vote out those who don't follow her views. Right in time for our election cycle.
But why not any of these other countries?
And why did she take a sail boat here? Oh, that's right, sail boats have less carbon footprint.... Then why did the have to two people FLY here on planes to pilot the boat back. . ... And carbon footprint? I was pretty sure that atmospheric carbon follows warming, not the other way around. Can you find any data that points to the opposite?
Whoop Whoop Psyral :
the_patriot_smack
9:43 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
Offline
Sorry, I misspoke. It's not that it's happening faster than expected. Its that there is more damage being caused than expected.
Here's the article:
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6459/eaaw6974
Part of the reason they were talking to the US is that it has the HIGHEST per capita carbon use of any country.
Here's an article discussing the Warming vs Carbon debate:
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm
9:55 pm
March 30, 2018
Offline
that is fake news for sure that graph is bullshit
Canada has 10 times less population than the USA how can we be so close and how can China be so low on that list??
do democrats also practice taqiya???
THE ALMIGHTY SMACK
10:45 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
Offline
the_blackface_smack said
that is fake news for sure that graph is bullshitCanada has 10 times less population than the USA how can we be so close and how can China be so low on that list??
do democrats also practice taqiya???
Do you know what per capita means?
11:07 pm
March 30, 2018
Offline
yes for each person
so how can Canada be right under America and China be way under both??
my father re-married a rich bitch from China I mean her father is a diplomat so my father goes every year I been twice he got re-married when I was 10 and China is nasty I mean it's poluted the sky is full of smog and everybody smokes 10 year olds smoke there.
granted I have not been there in over 20 years but I am sure it's only gotten worst there, remember what is considered a SMALL city in China has more people than Canada in it's entirity and by the way next to Russia Canada is the biggest country by size, that has the boreal forest, which spans the northern portion of the continent from Alaska all the way to Newfoundland, covers an astonishing 1.5 billion acres—larger than all but 6 countries
do you know how many tree's that is???
Canada's boreal forest (270 million hectares) stores carbon, purifies the air and water, and regulates the climate. Because a large portion of the world's boreal zone lies in Canada (28% or 552 million hectares), this country's boreal forest affects the health of the environment worldwide.
so fuck that that dumb greta girl has to say and fuck Trudeau for giving us a carbon tax fact is without Canada the worlds enviroment would be way more fucked so to say we are the second biggest problem is
#FakeNews
THE ALMIGHTY SMACK
11:54 pm
Members
August 6, 2013
Offline
the_blackface_smack said
yes for each personso how can Canada be right under America and China be way under both??
Because it is not TOTAL carbon. It is the amount of carbon a country produces compared to the population of the country.
Because there are much more people in China, you would need a much higher total output for the per capita to go up.
Korea is the one that really surprises me. Especially with the amount of mass transit that exists. Seoul to Jeju is the most popular domestic flight path in the world though, so there's that.
1:29 am
June 13, 2013
Offline
Yep our planet is fucked. Ya'll can sit here and make fun of this woman for saying something that needed to be said, but you have to admit that what she said was true. Our planet will die because of a choice made to ignore our changing climates. Our planet is fucked because rich people want to keep making money. Money won't be worth shit if there isn't a planet to spend it on.
But whatever.
"I Just Wanna Hide Inside My Own Private Hell"- Boondox
6:47 am
Moderators
February 15, 2014
Offline
She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future. So nice to see! https://t.co/1tQG6QcVKO
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 24, 2019
People who like and support this manufactured Greta puppet should follow her from 2018 to now. Look at where and how she came to be. Review her "impromptu" speeches in 2018. Google the words from her speeches and see where they really come from. Look into her handler, Luisa-Marie Neubauer, and her financiers. Look into her mom, Marlena Ernman. What about the people and the companies behind them and their connection to Greta. What about the close to 100,000,000,000,000 (yep, trillions) dollars locked in trust funds with those companies and organizations and what political agenda these companies have? Look at the failed predictions these organizations have made since the 1970s and what reactions they have caused in the global markets. Who benefited from those reactions and how much money did they make from it all. Where did the money get funneled and for what purpose?
Climate change is just the public face. There is WAY more to all this. This is about political control and social imprisonment of the global population to a just few key people. I am not big into democracies, I'm more into republics - but the people/companies/organizations at the top of all this promote some of the most anti-democractic agendas and have done so for close to half a century.
Maybe we do need to be concerned about the environment, but NOT through these people. They do NOT care about the environment. They really want something else. Explore and find out what their true agenda is.
Ok, enough of my tin-foil hat rant for now. I have to get back to work.
8:15 am
March 30, 2013
Offline9:54 am
May 4, 2014
Offline
Thirteen thousand years ago Ohio & New York were like the South Pole is today. They had mile-thick ice sheets. But keep acting like humans are in charge of the climate, Greta. Wonder why she's not addressing China & India for their massive pollution. Probably because her handlers know that those based cultures aren't designed to value the weaponized whining of indoctrinated children. Here's the sane man I linked to earlier explaining that science "has nothing to do with consensus". It's all about the facts, and this UN climate "consensus" is just a preordained political agenda:
https://youtu.be/PbihGWTT2IY?t=245
YouTube Video Climate Change A Catastrophists Perspective Part 1
 |
 |
 |
1:00 pm
Moderators
February 15, 2014
Offline
Old Mr Dangerous said
Sigh....
@old-mr-dangerous , Sigh....
That was written by Dana Nuccitelli who co-authored the 2014 "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature" environment research letter to show that the 97% consensus that was reported by Cook (who also co-authored the above letter) was accurate. Let's look at the actual data in Cook's "study"...
11,944 abstracts about climate change were used in the study. Only 34% of those examined expressed any opinion about anthropogenic climate change base on Cook's criteria. (Anthropogenic: originating in human activity). 33% said that humans were the "main" cause. "Main" being defined by Cook in his study as quantifying the human factor being above or equal to 50% (which is the statistical definition of "main") or not specifying any quantifiers at all (which has never been used with the definition of a statistical "main" until his study). So out of the 34% of the total, 97% of the 34% showed humans causes or 33% of the total.
This means that per his criteria and definition of "main", 97% of the abstracts that specifically mention anthropogenic causes claimed either that the anthropogenic cause was quantified at >= 50% or didn't specified quantifiers.
It still is only 33% consensus of total abstracts of climate change papers examined that state any human cause.
When Professor David Legates from the Center for Climatic Research recreated Cook's study from the same exact abstracts that Cook used, he found that only 41 abstracts (0.3% of the 11,944 abstracts) met the scientific definition of Anthropgenic.
So, according to Legates, out of all the 11,944 abstracts about climate change, only 0.3% said that humans were the cause.
THAT'S A HUGE DISCREPANCY.
What is true? Who knows. Probably somewhere in between the 34% and 0.3% but nowhere close to 97%.
97% is BAD statistics. BAD data representation. BAD science... not that consensus has ever been scientific. Not one element of scientific procedure was followed in either of the above "studies".
...
Is climate change real? YES. I do not deny climate change.
I do deny studies that are intentionally bad and misleading representation of the data.
...
Are humans the main cause? Maybe.
We need true scientific research that is done following the scientific method that is reproducible 100% of the time. That is how all science is done.
3:10 pm
March 30, 2018
Offline
I feel bad for that Greta girl all this shows is that democrats are now abusing children
I believe she does believe this garbage because they brainwashed the poor girl into believing that crap
democrats and liberals are the worst kind of people this world has to offer
THE ALMIGHTY SMACK
3:12 pm
July 28, 2016
Offline
The shit that bugs me about the global warming debate is that it is often used to push some economic agenda.
Big corporations use the language of the left to lobby for laws that save them money and create tax cuts for them "reducing" plastic usage. Like the straw ban or the plastic bag ban. They create a narrative that allows people to think they have control and a role to play in saving our environment.
The vast majority of the plastic in the ocean is trash from fishing boats, not straws or plastic shopping bags. You'll never hear of a plastic fish net ban, though.
And the worst part is that poorer people will be hurt the worst by climate disasters and are often blamed for it.
Meanwhile assholes like bezos horde more money than they'll ever use in a lifetime and continue to exploit poor people and the environment so that his pile of gold is a little taller.
If you really believed that all lives matter we wouldn't need to say black lives matter
3:28 pm
May 4, 2014
Offline
For anyone interested in actually learning something (perhaps how to ask the next good question), here's Joe Rogan with sane man Randall Carlson discussing evidence-based climate change. Emphasis on based.
YouTube Video Joe Rogan Experience #606 - Randall Carlson
|
|
|
10:52 am
April 25, 2017
Offline
The supposed man-made connection to "global warming" is a hoax.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-07-12-climate-change-hoax-collapses-new-science-cloud-cover.html
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-06/jcu-ordered-to-pay-1.2m-compensation-peter-ridd/11487086
https://www.zerohedge.com/health/climate-alarmist-sued-skeptic-defamation-and-lost
Here's what's funny about this last case with Mr. Mann, the fraud.
He has refused a court order to reveal his data. That's a pretty damning statement of the lack of transparency in climate science. It's considered to be a 'best practice' to reveal all of your data unless there is a specific reason, such as a known equipment failure, that makes part of the data incorrect.
When you refuse to reveal your data, you are not a scientist. You are a dogmatist who is hiding something. When you refuse a court order, you are also a criminal. Enough said.
UN climate “consensus” is just a preordained political agenda
It's called destroying national sovereignty. Look up Agenda 21. The owners of the planet HATE national sovereignty.
11:05 am
April 25, 2017
Offline11:11 am
July 28, 2016
Offline
Remember kids, the good questions aren't
Why is this happening
What can we do to stop it
Are we responsible
How can we survive
No, the best question is how can we insult this child who is upset about it
If you really believed that all lives matter we wouldn't need to say black lives matter
All RSSMost Users Ever Online: 591
Currently Online:
81 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
The Warlock: 11663
King Lucem Ferre: 9098
Old Mr Dangerous: 8974
krunk: 8060
OCJ_Brendan: 6148
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 755
Members: 3743
Moderators: 6
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 5
Forums: 28
Topics: 12299
Posts: 245363
Newest Members:
Frankingem, Williamitabs, Edgardrync, JimmieRom, NathanlofModerators: GanjaGoblin: 2873, Psyral: 4297, bozodklown: 394, scruffy: 11447, PunkRockJuggalo: 6559, Pigg: 6492
Administrators: admin: 1, ScottieD: 845
