November 27, 2022
18 Guests and 1 Member Online

Please consider Sign Uping
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Sign Up

Sign Up | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_TopicIcon
WW3
October 28, 2014
11:58 pm
Slumerican502
Louisville, Kentucky
Member
Forum Posts: 4706
Member Since:
December 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ltb you are arguing with a possibly drunken madman lol. This thread is fun though.

October 28, 2014
11:59 pm
Cabal
Member
Forum Posts: 2381
Member Since:
September 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I do have problems with humanity - Nothing to do with facts. 

Claps hands

October 28, 2014
11:59 pm
Cabal
Member
Forum Posts: 2381
Member Since:
September 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Slumerican502 said
Ltb you are arguing with a possibly drunken madman lol. This thread is fun though.

the truth hurts

Claps hands

October 29, 2014
12:02 am
Cabal
Member
Forum Posts: 2381
Member Since:
September 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'm still waiting on this evidence the West can defeat China and Russia very patiently, unlike a drunken madman. But I've only seen sore assholes so far....no evidence at all! :)

Claps hands

October 29, 2014
12:04 am
Cabal
Member
Forum Posts: 2381
Member Since:
September 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

To be honest I'm quite shocked you even see yourselves as an independent nation at all, considering all the money Israel takes from you on the yearly....(LOL) they do that to Canada as well...

Claps hands

October 29, 2014
12:12 am
twiztidkillaxxx2
Member
Forum Posts: 4364
Member Since:
July 15, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

And no money goes to Detroit

October 29, 2014
12:15 am
King Lucem Ferre
Member
Forum Posts: 9099
Member Since:
September 18, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

My amateur opinion.

 

I agree with Lt. B that I don't believe an actual world war will happen for a bit for the same exact reason he mentioned.

Then again, that could just be hope blinding me too.

 

I disagree with Lt. B with whether or not we can take them. I don't have quite as much faith in our military as he does. But he comes from a military/cop family and that often times clouds his judgement.

October 29, 2014
12:17 am
King Lucem Ferre
Member
Forum Posts: 9099
Member Since:
September 18, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

And ultimately these are nothing more than predictions. So nobody is really wrong.

October 29, 2014
12:19 am
Cabal
Member
Forum Posts: 2381
Member Since:
September 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

twiztidkillaxxx2 said
And no money goes to Detroit

Truth!!!

Claps hands

October 29, 2014
12:22 am
Cabal
Member
Forum Posts: 2381
Member Since:
September 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Lucem (Just An Asshole) Ferre said
And ultimately these are nothing more than predictions. So nobody is really wrong.

True in a sense, but we only have two sides to the game. If you haven't yet figured out the two sides, it's tougher to imagine, but the facts are there,,, and there are two sides facing off right now...who both have multiple nations behind them...

Claps hands

October 29, 2014
12:41 am
Miklo Velka
Member
Forum Posts: 3479
Member Since:
January 19, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There will never be another real "World War". All y'all should read this book-

October 29, 2014
12:51 am
King Lucem Ferre
Member
Forum Posts: 9099
Member Since:
September 18, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

But Miklo, I don't know how to read!

October 29, 2014
6:00 am
scruffy
Moderator
Forum Posts: 11447
Member Since:
May 22, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Cabal said

The Notorious, L.T.B. said
[stuff about nuclear war]    

You don't know the first thing about modern day warfare. 
First you should check into realistic numbers of warheads, and then you'll see America are outnumbered et cetera et cetera    

nuclear war is categorically not modern warfare.  that is generation-and-a-half-ago warfare.  vintage 1970s.  

  

modern warfare [from our point of view, anyway] is semi-mechanized counterinsurgency, with air support.  

if it came down to proper armies in direct combat, then most likely it would be combined-arms maneuver warfare.  

  

nukes?  no.  

the thinking warrior is not bringin nuclear weapons into it.  waaay old-world.  

  

bottom line on the nuclear option, is that the us has [assumed-to-be] effective SLBMs, and nobody else does.  

at worst, everybody dies.  

at best, we get gutshot, but painfully recover;  the enemy is beheaded, and defeated in detail at our leisure.  

  

  awfully paranoid, arent you?   

October 29, 2014
9:56 am
Avatar
krunk
Juggalo Island
Member
Forum Posts: 7665
Member Since:
May 4, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Here's Zeitgeist's take on World Wars (war=profit.) Interesting stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....u7FZZfwb3I

V23W2ws.gif V23W2ws.gif V23W2ws.gif RAFtn26.gif 3hm5B2c.gif VFyFLdU.gif V23W2ws.gif

                              

October 29, 2014
10:32 am
Old Mr Dangerous
Member
Forum Posts: 8871
Member Since:
March 30, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The Notorious, L.T.B. said
I stay informed as I possibly can. I just don't buy into the hyper-paranoid antigovernment rhetoric. I don't know shit about strategizing, but my point is US, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Australia, etc. can and will shit all over any A-team the east can throw together. All Russia has is ferocity and all China and North Korea have are bodies. If this shit were to go hot though, everyone on all sides is shooting themselves in the dick financially though. That's why I just think it's gonna be nothing but proxy wars and wars between "unimportant" nations. As for nukes, come on dude. Mutually. Assured. Destruction. Know what that means? No one is ever gonna use the fucking things. They're pointless. Big, shiny, radioactive cock pieces. If money and real estate are supposedly all politicians care about, why would they annhilate all life on earth for centuries to come? They wouldn't. Unless they genuinely are bat shit fucking insane, in which case who gives a shit? We're all dead anyway. 

Cosign. I'm not worried. Even if war happens tomorrow, then it is what it is.

October 29, 2014
11:24 am
The Notorious, L.T.B.
Fort Wayne, IN
Member
Forum Posts: 4001
Member Since:
May 29, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

krunkazphuk said
Here's Zeitgeist's take on World Wars (war=profit.) Interesting stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....u7FZZfwb3I

Those movies are such a crock it's sickening. Watched all 3.

Blood rains down from an angry sky! My cock rages on! My cock rages on!

October 29, 2014
1:18 pm
Sean Law
Member
Forum Posts: 3352
Member Since:
February 24, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

TBH, I really don't keep up with world events. IF a WW3 happens, so be it. I don't worry about shit I cant control.  That's not saying I don't care, but if it does happen then god bless @ltb for stepping right into that mess.

im also not tooooo big on Nostradamus's quatrains, but some I find interesting.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....VVcEV1-uNk

I'll fuck you till you love me, Faggot!

-Tyson

October 29, 2014
3:14 pm
Cabal
Member
Forum Posts: 2381
Member Since:
September 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

scruffy said

Cabal said

The Notorious, L.T.B. said
[stuff about nuclear war]    

You don't know the first thing about modern day warfare. 
First you should check into realistic numbers of warheads, and then you'll see America are outnumbered et cetera et cetera    

nuclear war is categorically not modern warfare.  that is generation-and-a-half-ago warfare.  vintage 1970s.  

  

modern warfare [from our point of view, anyway] is semi-mechanized counterinsurgency, with air support.  

if it came down to proper armies in direct combat, then most likely it would be combined-arms maneuver warfare.  

  

nukes?  no.  

the thinking warrior is not bringin nuclear weapons into it.  waaay old-world.  

  

bottom line on the nuclear option, is that the us has [assumed-to-be] effective SLBMs, and nobody else does.  

at worst, everybody dies.  

at best, we get gutshot, but painfully recover;  the enemy is beheaded, and defeated in detail at our leisure.  

  

I guess I should of said futuristic warfare (months or years from now). That definitely won't be the definition you said. That to me sounds like the attacks on weaker nations for resources or to overthrow a government. Kind of like what is going on with the proxy battles in the middle east or fighting in Ukraine. For right now they're doing the old sanctions routine with each other - with a newly added computer hacking attacks that most don't realize the danger to.

It appears nuclear war won't be what it would have been in the cold war, but more of a - who can shoot the satellites down first and then move infantry into the lights out county to take over. Look at the the secret space launches in the past few months from Russia, China, and the States. They're in a hurry for sure. I have to say the private non-Nasa launch recently from the States of the dragon was very impressive. Never seen anything like that one.

There's still the risk of nukes being fired from the likes of Israel to damn near anyone around them, if they go even crazier. And Pakistan and India are almost a guarantee to fire off there's at each other if shit goes down. North Korea is another one we can't predict. 

It's a scary time right now in the world. 

Claps hands

October 29, 2014
3:17 pm
Cabal
Member
Forum Posts: 2381
Member Since:
September 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Russia does have some very impressive SLBMs now, too. In the first video I posted. They not only successfully tested a few months ago but actually detonated them in Siberia.

Claps hands

October 29, 2014
3:30 pm
scruffy
Moderator
Forum Posts: 11447
Member Since:
May 22, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

they dont have a platform to put em in.  or rather, they do, but we got em well outclassed.  

you can bet that every russian ssbn [every ssbn worldwide, actually] has an american attack sub sitting on it, just out of detection range.  

its nice to know that your warheads will detonate, that is important.  but it helps you very little if the birds never leave the ocean.  

  

also, last i looked, the bulk of russias nuclear force was still largely either fixed silos, or mobile launchers tied to the railways.  both are much simpler to counterforce.  

  

  awfully paranoid, arent you?   

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 591

Currently Online:
50 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

The Warlock: 11574

King Lucem Ferre: 9099

Old Mr Dangerous: 8871

krunk: 7665

OCJ_Brendan: 6148

patjoyce: 4891

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 755

Members: 8268

Moderators: 6

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 6

Forums: 28

Topics: 12136

Posts: 242087

Newest Members:

Charlesmek, leilamd60, agnesra1, EjdsiTwimbtig, jamiekd4, jonyj16

Moderators: GanjaGoblin: 2803, Psyral Infection: 4276, bozodklown: 390, scruffy: 11447, PunkRockJuggalo: 6559, Pigg: 6491

Administrators: admin: 0, ScottieD: 845